The point of a coop is primarily reduce the cost of the hobby. It is not make the coop manager money. However, massive coops + one person = nightmare. It causes people to, unfortunatley, close coops early. Everybody feels bad and the coop manager knows he has a ton of work coming up. However, what I noticed after evaluating a few of the BOM's is that just a few parts are significant portion of the cost. What is further compounded, at least in my mind from previous experience is 90% of the coop managers work is in parts that are maybe 10% of the cost. so, what I have done, with other hobbies is take the burden of the big hitters and let everyone else handle their own little stuff. Or in this case, make mouser do all the dirty work.
For example:
Aether, QTY 1 = $137.15 just for parts
Aether, QTY 100 = $89.71 just for parts
Pretty obvious..coops save money.
However, of that $47.44 savings 90% of it is within 8 unique parts or 18 total parts.
So what i'm asking is how people would feel about hybrid coops where when you participate, you are cooping to get the PCB and the "big hitters" and you go out and get the others?
This in turn would:
1. Get people 90% of the savings
2. Reduce the coop managers work load significantly
I could just imagine how much time this would save RJ's father on the LE's and still mee the primary goal of a coop.
-------
Note: I have ignored PCB's. These guys automatically save money when coop'd, especially large coops.