I was wondering the same thing as Chris. Exactly what specs are you going to us to compare them? I was at the UNscientific shootout at the Academy and even there, some of the reading really didn't make much sense. In some cases, it was obvious how and why the readings were what they were but if all you went by were the readings alone without seeing them, you would be mislead. For example, one of the "floods" had a light output similar to the AetherII but it had a light output more like a spot light. Another had a light output much higher than the AetherII and it really was that much brighter but it was a commercial unit that had either 2 or 4 bulbs and was many times the cost of the AetherII. Even when the Aether and AetherII were compared, the AetherII had a much higher reading on the meter but being there, I could see that they really were not that much different in either brightness or beam pattern or at least not enough to justify the difference in readings. What was different though was the color temp. The Aether was putting out a blue er light than the AetherII which could account for a lower reading on the meter. While the meter readings didn't mean much in that demo, actually seeing them and what they could do was great.
I hope that when you guys do this, you do this with a more scientific method if you intend to share the results. That would require all of the lights projecting on the same surface, from the same distance, at the same angle, with the same or very similar pattern, and at or near the same color temps so that the meter can record them correctly. Otherwise, I would toss the meter and just show a video of the outputs but even here, you would still need the same surface, same distance, and same angle to make a valid comparison. Either way, good luck and have fun.
