Thanks for the answers.
I understand that one can not do a full dmx univerise on the transmission (just up to the channel number of the highest channel one is changing). However, I do believe the lynx Donlge always puts out a full 512 channels regardless.
I am not taking about a serial baud rate to the dongle. I don't write to the dongle as a serial device. But I do present to the dongle new data about every 25 msec (thus a rate). And I do provide a complete 512 channels worth of data.
So I am not worried about the rate (in terms of a serial device) of writing to the dongle. THat is constant, and a new data set is presented every 25 msec.
What I am noticing, is that if I put the data stream over wireless to the lynx express, I don't see some of my updates (yet I do if I I am wired). So I am wondering it he wireless transmission can actually keep up with the dmx rate of change (if the transmission over wireless is slower, then data would overwrite itself or be "dropped"), which is what I am seeing.
Dennis, I believe your statement of 56K was for the actual wireless transmission, which would seem to correspond what I am seeing. So effectively, if you use the wireless, your refresh/update rates for channel changes is restricted (if you plan to actually see them). This is what I am observing, and that seems to make sense). I wish that had been noted for the wireless if this is all correct, for that can directly influence the usefulness of the wireless for a particular situation.