Author Topic: pixels vs nodes for a mega tree  (Read 7727 times)

Offline kernal

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 240
Re: pixels vs nodes for a mega tree
« Reply #30 on: November 05, 2013, »
That tree is frikken awesome!!!!!!    >.d9   cant wait to see a video!
My license plate says blinky.

Offline jnealand

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2494
Re: pixels vs nodes for a mega tree
« Reply #31 on: November 05, 2013, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Just wait until you get the weight of all the lights on it.  Then watch out.  Looks good so far.

that's the one thing that makes me wonder about using pvc versus emt. the pvc is SOOOO much easier to drill and work with though!

But the pvc is only carrying one string of lights.  It is the center pole that needs to be stronger, i.e., metal in my opinion.
Jim Nealand
Kennesaw, GA

Offline taybrynn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2042
    • RockinChristmas
Re: pixels vs nodes for a mega tree
« Reply #32 on: November 05, 2013, »
Thanks all for the comments.

(1) each of the 24 pairs of vertical conduits (15' +) is carrying the weight of (1) 128 node smart string ... not that much.

(2) the pole is a thicker steel, much stronger than anything I've used in the past ... in fact my Dad drove into Denver to buy a single piece that was extra strong ... think it was a 20' pole to start with, cut it down.
Scott - Castle Rock, Colorado   [ 2 homes, 100% RGB in 2016; since 2008; over 32k channels of E1.31 ]
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline jnealand

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2494
Re: pixels vs nodes for a mega tree
« Reply #33 on: November 05, 2013, »
Can we borrow your dad?  We all need help like he gives.
Jim Nealand
Kennesaw, GA