Author Topic: PIXELNET WIRELESS  (Read 5283 times)

Offline sittinguphigh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
PIXELNET WIRELESS
« on: January 12, 2013, »
Looking to make PIXELNET wireless work.

I don't know that much about pixelnet or wireless systems and how they work.
But I would like to look into it. Maybe find some thing that would work.

I put in a call to this company. There going to have some one call me back.
I think this is the company that came up with PIXELNET.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Does any one know of information centers or companies that could help.

Thanks

Mort
What you don't know. Can hurt you.

Offline chrisatpsu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3729
  • ahhh, yes... my new blink-i-nator 3000!!!
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2013, »
it's not related,

RJ came up with the pixelnet protocol for smart strings. they don't do wireless...
To rule the entire tri-state area!  What's that? Perry the Platypus!!!

Offline TexasStingray

  • Coop Manager
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 791
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2013, »
All the PixelNet controllers need 12v and it was designed to use network wire which only need to use 6 of the 8 for voltage. That leaves the other 2 for PixelNet. I think the conductor talking to a slave which can be across the street will use wireless, at least that's my understanding. But it won't be sending Pixelnet only a sync signal.
Scott Wanner
TX

Watch my videos
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline chrisatpsu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3729
  • ahhh, yes... my new blink-i-nator 3000!!!
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2013, »
conductor and slave send pixelnet out the rj45 jack, this can't be sent via wireless.

they receive the sync signal via the magjack which is regular ethernet networking
To rule the entire tri-state area!  What's that? Perry the Platypus!!!

Offline sittinguphigh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2013, »
OK. Thanks for the information.
What you don't know. Can hurt you.

Offline Steve Gase

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2915
    • WinterLightShow in Georgetown, TX
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2013, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
conductor and slave send pixelnet out the rj45 jack, this can't be sent via wireless.

they receive the sync signal via the magjack which is regular ethernet networking
i know the discussion about wireless pixelnet comes up often, and i agree that pixelnet protocol will not go over wireless unless RH creates a new device with that purpose. 
 
BUT... I don't understand why you couldn't use a wireless hub and wireless switch to transmit the E1.31 packets from the computer (through wireless) to the EtherDongle.  The EtD would then be located in the yard, across the street, etc.

Similarly, maybe (has anyone tried?) the wireless interface that is used to connect conductor/slave [ASUS 802.11b/g/n Portable Wireless Router (WL-330N)] could be used to connect computer/EtD.  (The MagJack is compatible with that interface.)
« Last Edit: January 12, 2013, by Steve Gase »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  |  110K channels, 50K lights  |  Nutcracker, Falcon, DLA, HolidayCoro

Offline chrisatpsu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3729
  • ahhh, yes... my new blink-i-nator 3000!!!
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2013, »
i tested the etherdongle receiving E1.31 packets from the pc via a linksys wireless router / Linksys Wireless Bridge. It worked, but i didn't try 1000's of channels.

but in all honesty, the more these channel counts keep going up, the more likely you're going to flood the network anyways...

at least with a conductor / slave, you wont flood the network, and can theoretically run millions of channels. (just in 16k chunks here and there)
To rule the entire tri-state area!  What's that? Perry the Platypus!!!

Offline sittinguphigh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2013, »
Now that's a start.

Some questions.

What is the E1.31 packets? Is that the pixelnet information before it is decode to pixelnet coming from the PC to the ETD?

If that is right that is sending e1.31 threw the wireless router to the ETD.
Can that work with the basic pixelnet dongle? That can use 4096 channels.  If I read the pixelnet dongle right you can add on to ss hubs with 16 smart strings and keep going on.

Just have to know how much channels your can send.

And if it is limited then maybe you can just copy of the same sequence to other shows. A repeat.
Like other houses. Or people. Cars or horses like I do. Maybe people.

This may be a dumb question but why can't you send the data information coming out of the dongle threw wireless?


 



« Last Edit: January 13, 2013, by sittinguphigh »
What you don't know. Can hurt you.

Offline rm357

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1282
  • 31088
PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2013, »
Wireless Ethernet works great as long as you have a good wifi signal.

This is going to be a lot of hardware for sittinguphigh's application...

You need a small PC running your scheduler, a wireless wifi hub, etherdongle, pixelnet hub, SSCs, and smartstrings on the lead horse.

An wifi unit set up as a bridge, etherdongle, pixelnet hub, SSCs, and strings on each of the other horses.

You also need lots of batteries...

Based on his earlier posts, this is going to be way over budget as well.

Robert
Warner Robins, Georgia, USA

Offline rm357

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1282
  • 31088
PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2013, »
Why can't you send the data coming out of the dongle through the wireless?

Currently there is no device that we know of that is compatible with the data being sent out.
The wireless device would have to be capable of handling a 1Mbps data stream with 8 bit serial words.



Robert
Warner Robins, Georgia, USA

Offline JonB256

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
    • My website
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2013, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The wireless device would have to be capable of handling a 1Mbps data stream with 8 bit serial words.

This device does Wireless Serial data, and almost reaches 1Mbps speed, but it costs much more than I'd be willing to spend for something that still might not work:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline Steve Gase

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2915
    • WinterLightShow in Georgetown, TX
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2013, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The wireless device would have to be capable of handling a 1Mbps data stream with 8 bit serial words.

This device does Wireless Serial data, and almost reaches 1Mbps speed, but it costs much more than I'd be willing to spend for something that still might not work:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Using a true serial device then brings up the complication of using multicast.  to reach all of the horses, you need multicast.  Multicast is used by RJ's E1.31 protocol to reach the EtD, but downstream from the EtD the protocol is NOT multicast.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  |  110K channels, 50K lights  |  Nutcracker, Falcon, DLA, HolidayCoro

Offline sittinguphigh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2013, »
Wireless Serial data what would that compute in channels?
I did see some of these with board only for 11.00 to 25.00 dollars on ebay.
If these are the same ones. Not multicast but it's a option.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

This could work for multicast to houses next to you. All one show.
If your neighbors have Christmas lights your just add them on.
With very little cost to them. Just extra wire and a wireless board. You may need a hub.
But keep the cost down for them. Be more willing to join in.

Or have the whole show with people walking. Wow that would be cool.
You could do caroling this way.

With Cars the same way. The car music people would love this.

A mobile Christmas show. Go were the people are.

Your children would love it to use this for school or church Christmas functions.









What you don't know. Can hurt you.

Offline dpitts

  • Restrictive
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 466
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2013, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Wireless Serial data what would that compute in channels?
I did see some of these with board only for 11.00 to 25.00 dollars on ebay.
If these are the same ones. Not multicast but it's a option.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

This could work for multicast to houses next to you. All one show.
If your neighbors have Christmas lights your just add them on.
With very little cost to them. Just extra wire and a wireless board. You may need a hub.
But keep the cost down for them. Be more willing to join in.

Or have the whole show with people walking. Wow that would be cool.
You could do caroling this way.

With Cars the same way. The car music people would love this.

A mobile Christmas show. Go were the people are.

Your children would love it to use this for school or church Christmas functions.

The linked product can only handle 1/10th the data rate needed for a wireless Pixelnet. The conductor/slave is the envisioned solution. If you do not like that method maybe use E131 with routers but that defeats the purpose of minimizing the network traffic to just a sync packet with conductor/slave.

Offline Steve Gase

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2915
    • WinterLightShow in Georgetown, TX
Re: PIXELNET WIRELESS
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2013, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Wireless Serial data what would that compute in channels?
I did see some of these with board only for 11.00 to 25.00 dollars on ebay.
If these are the same ones. Not multicast but it's a option.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

This could work for multicast to houses next to you. All one show.
If your neighbors have Christmas lights your just add them on.
With very little cost to them. Just extra wire and a wireless board. You may need a hub.
But keep the cost down for them. Be more willing to join in.

Or have the whole show with people walking. Wow that would be cool.
You could do caroling this way.

With Cars the same way. The car music people would love this.

A mobile Christmas show. Go were the people are.

Your children would love it to use this for school or church Christmas functions.

The linked product can only handle 1/10th the data rate needed for a wireless Pixelnet. The conductor/slave is the envisioned solution. If you do not like that method maybe use E131 with routers but that defeats the purpose of minimizing the network traffic to just a sync packet with conductor/slave.
+1
Lead horse:  EtD with Conductor-daughter board, active smart hub, power suppply, ASUS wireless router, SSCs and strings.
Partner horses: EtD with Slave-daughter board, active smart hub, power suppply, ASUS wireless router, SSCs and strings.
 
With this, each horse has 4096 channels and all horses are coordinated with the others.  You are limited only by the amount of battery you can carry.  Heck, add more hubs... or even double up the entire setup to get 32,768 on a horse.  ;)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  |  110K channels, 50K lights  |  Nutcracker, Falcon, DLA, HolidayCoro