Author Topic: falcon  (Read 1061 times)

Offline David Glenn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
falcon
« on: January 22, 2017, »
looking into falcon player. we have conductor but was not aware they don't work
« Last Edit: January 23, 2017, by David Glenn »

Offline bcstuff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
  • Cape Coral, FL 33991
Re: PIXELNET ETHERDONGLE AND SLAVE
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2017, »
FYI,

The Conductor allowed standalone operation of the Etherdongle to output 16,384 channels of pixelnet (4 pixlenet universes).
 
The Conductor had the ability to send a sync packet to a Slave so that you could have another 4 universes of pixelnet 16,385 - 32,768

I don't believe the Slave will work without a Conductor as a standalone player.

If you are looking for a standalone player for the Etherdongle, I would look into the Falcon Player (FPP).
This can also have slave units.
-Brian
-------------
2017 - Complete makeover, let's just say it's gonna be a few pixels.

2016 - Grad School Stinks :(
2015 - 16' Megatree, 8' MidiTrees, 8' MegaWreath, 6' Snowflake Spinners, Zwilluminariesâ„¢

Our Display Videos: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline David Glenn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
Re: PIXELNET ETHERDONGLE AND SLAVE
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2017, »
I have the conductor i'm ready to expand to 32,ooo plus channels

Offline duane.mosley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 988
    • hearthstonelights.com
Re: PIXELNET ETHERDONGLE AND SLAVE
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2017, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I have the conductor i'm ready to expand to 32,ooo plus channels

did you get the conductor to work properly? I, as well as many others, never got our conductors to work properly.

for the money, i would switch to the raspberry pi and use the falcon pi player. FLAWLESS OPERATION!!
Florence, KY


facebook.com/hearthstonelights

Offline CaptainMurdoch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 180
Re: PIXELNET ETHERDONGLE AND SLAVE
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2017, »
Out of curiosity, does anyone know if this sync packet or protocol is documented anywhere?  :)