Author Topic: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE  (Read 60428 times)

Offline solidmodeler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 113
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #90 on: March 08, 2009, »
Sounding exceptional to me.. Sounds like the right path to me. You must be a really efficient worker with all you get done.
Michael

Lights, more lights, more controllers, more, more, more

Offline brandonj

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 60
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #91 on: March 09, 2009, »
So will the wireless transmitter require the DMX dongle, or will it be completely separate, or will there be a choice?
RJ's last post made me think it would plug in to the DMX dongle, but other posts made me think otherwise.  So what is the right answer?

(or has that decision been made yet?)

So far, it looks like you have a very desirable product! Good work, RJ!

-Brandon

Offline RJ

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8519
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #92 on: March 10, 2009, »
It plugs into your dongle, It requires a receiver designed for the Lynx Express. It does not work with other devices at this point. This will be a Lynx only wireless system. In other words it will not be able to used it on other systems as it stands. I think that answers your question.

RJ
Innovation beats imitation - and it's more satisfying

Offline IronRuss

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #93 on: March 10, 2009, »
RJ

Is there going to be a cat5 output on the transmitter? Or is a person going to have to use a splitter before the transmitter if they want to run another DMX line out of the house?

Russ

Offline rrowan

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5899
  • 08096
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #94 on: March 10, 2009, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
RJ

Is there going to be a cat5 output on the transmitter? Or is a person going to have to use a splitter before the transmitter if they want to run another DMX line out of the house?

Russ

Hi Russ

I believe that you need a separate dongle for each universe. The transmitter will broadcast a full universe. I have not see any proto types yet and RJ has not posted any info about a wired dmx output on the transmitter.

So if you want wireless and wired from your computer it will require two dongles.

The above is just my guess.

Rick R.
Light Animation Hobby - Having fun and Learning at the same time. (21st member of DLA)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Warning SOME assembly required

Offline brandonj

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 60
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #95 on: March 10, 2009, »
Correct me if i am wrong, but I believe you will be able to use the DMX OUT ports on an LE board that has a wireless receiver on it - so you wouldnt really need to run another line from the computer.

So it could go something like this:


COMPUTER ----->  DMX DONGLE  ----> WIRELESS TRANSMITTER - - - -> Lynx Express ----> Lynx Freestyle


Am I right in saying this?

-Brandon

Offline Ron

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1387
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #96 on: March 10, 2009, »
Yep you are right Brandon.  RJ said the DMX 2 out on the newer LE boards is connected to the wireless and will allow you to push DMX out after having been received through the wireless.

Pretty cool.

Offline vairmoose

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 827
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #97 on: March 10, 2009, »
Brandon, There are an almost infinite combination that you could create but you have the basic idea.   The  Wireless (as I understand it) could be the link (transmitter + receiver) between any two Lynxx components in place of the CAT5 (DMX) connection but I'm guessing that it would always be best right after the dongle.  

   Also there could be several receivers for each transmitter.    

  Not sure if there can only be one transmitter downstream of any single dongle, but it makes sense that this would be so.  

Larry.
3 today (standing at light switch, holding two lighters)
Going live in 2012

Offline REM

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #98 on: March 10, 2009, »
Seems like the question that everyone is skirting around is this: on a wireless-equipped Express, will both DMX-out ports be operational or only the newer #2 port?

Offline vairmoose

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 827
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #99 on: March 10, 2009, »
No skirting..   just a little tap dancing. 

Both "outs" have the full DMX.   

Larry.
3 today (standing at light switch, holding two lighters)
Going live in 2012

Offline RJ

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8519
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #100 on: March 10, 2009, »
DMX2 is the only output from the Wireless.

RJ
Innovation beats imitation - and it's more satisfying

Offline vairmoose

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 827
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #101 on: March 10, 2009, »
OK.   Back to the back of the class for me.      Apparently I missunderstood what was being said.   Disregard my previous post.

Larry. 
3 today (standing at light switch, holding two lighters)
Going live in 2012

Offline RJ

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8519
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #102 on: March 10, 2009, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
OK.   Back to the back of the class for me.      Apparently I missunderstood what was being said.   Disregard my previous post.

Larry. 

Hah! I just confuse people!

RJ
Innovation beats imitation - and it's more satisfying

Offline Ron

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1387
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #103 on: March 11, 2009, »
RJ,

What about the V1 LE boards?  They have a spot for the wireless module but only 1 DMX out.  Will we be able to use the DMX1 out on the LE V1 boards to output a DMX signal through the RJ45 port?

Thanks.

Ron

Offline REM

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: WIRELESS DMX PROJECT UPDATE
« Reply #104 on: March 11, 2009, »
From everything I have heard it's not possible. Only DMX2 has the necessary traces/components to make it work.

Ron (the other one)