Author Topic: e-Dongle VS p-Dongle  (Read 5734 times)

Offline MrChristmas2000

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: e-Dongle VS p-Dongle
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2012, »
RJ,

OK now I have completed the Vixen test.

I created a 15 second sequence with the following configuration.
Lynx E1.31 output 4096 channels. 50ms intervals
Channel 1 turned ON/OFF for the full 15 seconds.
Channel 3585 - 3592 arch rolls with varrying speeds outputting DMX to a Lynx Express.

I also built an LSP file that did exactly the same as above.

Both resulted in jerkey output of the e-dongle.


Offline RJ

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8519
Re: e-Dongle VS p-Dongle
« Reply #16 on: June 23, 2012, »
Thank you, I will look at it once i have my shop together and can get a few hours of time.

RJ
Innovation beats imitation - and it's more satisfying

Offline MrChristmas2000

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: e-Dongle VS p-Dongle
« Reply #17 on: June 26, 2012, »
I now have my July 4 show lights up and generally working.

I am using my p-dongel for now.

If you do find that time between now and July 4th I would be happy to live beta any code you come up with.

Tom

Offline MrChristmas2000

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: e-Dongle VS p-Dongle
« Reply #18 on: July 17, 2012, »
RJ

Just wondering if you have your shop back together.  Surely there has been a little time available to check out this little problem?  <pop..


Offline RJ

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8519
Re: e-Dongle VS p-Dongle
« Reply #19 on: July 15, 2013, »
Can some verify if this now ok on current firmware or if is something I need to look at when I am working on code?

RJ
Innovation beats imitation - and it's more satisfying