Author Topic: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!  (Read 4376 times)

Offline animal

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 216
RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« on: October 25, 2012, »
Hey everyone,
     We need to make sure anyone who is now and in the near future going to use LSP and Export to the conductor, needs to go here and cast your vote in this titled poll. It seems we've lost the ability to export to a conductor format from LSP. This is a bug. The poll is going to determined the priority ,and urgency of when this gets fixed. Personally,I think it's a disservice to lose something we already had, but I'm sure it will all work out.

                  Please go to vote         You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

                             Thank you,
                                animal

Offline mmulvenna

  • Patron Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2012, »
There is no intent to lose the feature only to get the proper priority assigned to it in relation to other issues. So as animal says, if you are an LSP user, please vote.
Thanks
Mike

Offline Steve Gase

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2915
    • WinterLightShow in Georgetown, TX
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2012, »
Which (earlier) release of LSP still worked with conductor?
Could we use the latest software to develop the sequence, and revert to the earlier version to write to the conductor format?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  |  110K channels, 50K lights  |  Nutcracker, Falcon, DLA, HolidayCoro

Offline twooly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 837
  • Blah
    • Todd Woolums
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2012, »
The option to export to the conductor has only been available in 2.5
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline frankr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
    • Rocklin Lights
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2012, »
who wants to volunteer to test some sequences converted by my tool to conductor format?

Frank

I should note that my tool only works with 2.5 sequences.

Offline peteandvanessa

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 492
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2012, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
who wants to volunteer to test some sequences converted by my tool to conductor format?

Frank

I should note that my tool only works with 2.5 sequences.

I'm up for it. My Halloween lights come down next week (and I'm not planning a Christmas one) so I can start testing as soon as my conductor arrives from the current COOP.

Offline Steve Gase

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2915
    • WinterLightShow in Georgetown, TX
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2012, »
I'll give it a try!
I want to use the tool for both xlights and conductor.

Thx!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  |  110K channels, 50K lights  |  Nutcracker, Falcon, DLA, HolidayCoro

Offline twooly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 837
  • Blah
    • Todd Woolums
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2012, »
Ill be testing tonight frank once my kids go to bed :)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline frankr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
    • Rocklin Lights
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2012, »
Note what I published so far will only export to xLights but the code is in there to export to conducter as well.  Just need to add the GUI code to enable you to choose which format you want.

Or what would people say if I just export a .xseq and a .seq file and you pick the right one for your own application?

Frank

Offline twooly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 837
  • Blah
    • Todd Woolums
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2012, »
To me outputting both wouldn't be a problem, more data the better in my mind :)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline sittinguphigh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2012, »
Not sure what you guys are saying.
It seems like your saying the computer isn't down loading the shows to the conductor.


Thanks for all the hard work.

Mort






What you don't know. Can hurt you.

Offline sittinguphigh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2012, »
Not sure what you guys are saying.
It seems like your saying the computer isn't down loading the shows to the conductor?
Or is it that only some programs will not down load?


Thanks for all the hard work.

Mort






What you don't know. Can hurt you.

Offline wbuehler

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3579
  • Dont' that poster look dusty?
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2012, »
Using LSP 2.5 I have been able to Export conductor sequences that seem to work OK with the conductor.


Offline twooly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 837
  • Blah
    • Todd Woolums
Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2012, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Using LSP 2.5 I have been able to Export conductor sequences that seem to work OK with the conductor.

Are you using any layers/macros/transitions?  What build do you have?  Would you mind sharing a sequence that works so I can try on my machine to try on the conductor?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline dpitts

  • Restrictive
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 466
Re: Re: RJ's Conductor Poll!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2012, »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Using LSP 2.5 I have been able to Export conductor sequences that seem to work OK with the conductor.

What version of LSP are you using. It has been verified the lastest version has a problem. It outputs all zeros.